PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

$ 19.99 · 4.9 (752) · In stock

Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature, mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Objective: To compare the efficiency and effectiveness of Active laceback ligatures with that of Mulligan bypass arch for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Materials and Methods: 20 patients were selected for the study who required upper 1 st premolar extraction for decrowding. All patients were treated with 3M Gemini - MBT 0.022” metal brackets. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 10 patientsin each group. Group 1 was treated with active laceback ligature and group 2 with Mulligan bypass arch. Changes were measured on the cast with a digital vernier caliper. Student ‘t’test was used to determine the mean differences between the two groups for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Results: Significant distal movement of Canine occurred in both the groups. Movement of canine was more in group 2 but distal tipping of canine and distopalatal rotation of the molar was more in group 1. These differences were mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Conclusion: Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature.

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

PDF) Class II with ectopic canines in upper arch and severe crowding in lower arch treated by segmented arch technique- A case report

AMREP_Research_Report_2009.pdf - Alfred Hospital

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

V2 - PLANETS of ORTHODONTICS - Volume II - Diagnosis and Treatment Planning, PDF, Tooth

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion

PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses