PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures

PDF) Canine retraction rate and angulation with 0.017”X0.025” versus Canine retraction rate and angulation with 0.017”X0.025” versus 0.016”X0.022” stainless steel arch wire with a power arm 0.016”X0.022” stainless steel arch wire with

PDF] Effects of active and passive lacebacks on antero-posterior position of maxillary first molars and central incisors.

PDF) Effects of active and passive lacebacks on antero-posterior position of maxillary first molars and central incisors

PDF) Different Methods of Canine Retraction-Part 1

Figure 4 from Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures

PDF) The Impact of Canine Retraction on Anchorage Loss in Two Methods of Active Lace Back and NiTi Closed Coil Spring

PDF) Mulligan's Bypass Arch to Unravel Lower Crowding -A Case Report

Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of canine retraction using modified Marcotte and T-loop retraction springs – A split-mouth, randomized clinical trial

Figure 1 from Maxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets.

T-loop spring vs ricketts maxillary canine retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect

PDF] Effects of active and passive lacebacks on antero-posterior position of maxillary first molars and central incisors.

PDF) Biomechanics PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE IN Orthodontics Orthodontics Orthodontics PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE IN Orthodontics